Richard Gabb vs Edan Leshem, Herzliya 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard · Wed 9 Mar

Final

Richard Gabb

LostRank #1656

Leshem won in 2 sets · 1h 16m

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 24–6

Edan Leshem

WinnerRank #1953

Venue

Steele Tennis Club

Herzlia, ISR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

9 km/h

Light

Humidity

56%

Moderate

Temperature

29°C

Warm

Altitude

0 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 16m

6Aces7

2Double faults7

33Service points won34

10Service games played10

6Service games won8

10Return games played10

3/743%Break points saved50%2/4

2/450%Break points converted57%4/7

Head to head

0Gabb

1Leshem

1 meeting

HerzliyaRound of 16 · 9 Mar 2016HardThis match
Edan Leshem
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Richard Gabb
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Richard Gabb vs Edan Leshem, Herzliya 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research