Giovanni Lapentti vs Daniel Brands, Indian Wells Masters 2016, Qualifying R1
Final score
Final
7-6(2) 6-3Venue and conditions
Indian Wells Tennis GardenIndian Wells, USA
Outdoor hardCourt speed3.6 vs last year96.8Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 34m5Aces7
1Double faults0
54Service points won36
11Service games played10
10Service games won8
10Return games played11
3/475%Break points saved0%0/2
2/2100%Break points converted25%1/4
Head to head
2Lapentti
1Brands
3 meetingsHard 1–0Clay 1–1
- Indian Wells MastersQualifying R1 · 8 Mar 2016HardThis matchGiovanni LapenttiSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Daniel BrandsSets won: 0Set 1: 62Set 2: 3
- MarburgRound of 16 · 1 Jul 2015ClayDaniel BrandsSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Giovanni LapenttiSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 4
- FurthRound of 32 · 2 Jun 2015ClayGiovanni LapenttiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Daniel BrandsSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.