Alexandre Penaud vs Alexandre Sidorenko, Quimper 2016, Qualifying R2
Final score
Final
6-2 6-4Venue and conditions
Tennis Club Quimper — Créac’h-GwenQuimper, FRA
Indoor hardCourt speed1.9 vs last year109.7Very fast
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksAltitude8 mSea level
Match stats
51m9Aces11
2Double faults1
33Service points won37
9Service games played9
6Service games won9
9Return games played9
6/967%Break points saved100%1/1
0/10%Break points converted33%3/9
Head to head
1Penaud
2Sidorenko
3 meetingsHard 0–2Clay 1–0
- QuimperQualifying R2 · 27 Feb 2016HardThis matchAlexandre SidorenkoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Alexandre PenaudSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
- Bagnères-de-BigorreRound of 16 · 2012HardAlexandre SidorenkoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Alexandre PenaudSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 3
- Bagnoles-de-l'OrneQuarterfinal · 2012ClayAlexandre PenaudSets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Alexandre SidorenkoSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 65
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.