Cheong Eui Kim vs Bruno Santanna, Hammamet 2016, Round of 16

Final

Cheong Eui Kim

LostATP: 1103

Santanna won in 3 sets · 1h 57m

1–2

Set 17–5

Set 21–6

Set 32–6

Bruno Santanna

WinnerATP: 1272

Hotel Sentido PheniciaHammamet, TUN

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

81.7Very slow

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

21°CMild

17km/hGentle

71%Humid

7mSea level

Match stats

1h 57m

0Aces0

3Double faults4

45Service points won38

14Service games played13

5Service games won8

13Return games played14

10/1953%Break points saved17%1/6

5/683%Break points converted47%9/19

Head to head

0Kim

1Santanna

1 meeting

HammametRound of 16 · 25 Feb 2016ClayThis match
Bruno Santanna
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Cheong Eui Kim
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 1Set 3: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Cheong Eui Kim vs Bruno Santanna, Hammamet 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research