Haadin Bava vs Christopher Heyman, Antalya 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 25 Feb

Final

Haadin Bava

LostRank #1975

Heyman won in 2 sets · 1h 38m

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 24–6

Christopher Heyman

WinnerRank #1670

Venue

Venue not available

Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Match stats

1h 38m

2Aces1

0Double faults3

33Service points won41

9Service games played10

6Service games won9

10Return games played9

4/757%Break points saved67%2/3

1/333%Break points converted43%3/7

Head to head

0Bava

1Heyman

1 meeting

AntalyaRound of 16 · 25 Feb 2016HardThis match
Christopher Heyman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Haadin Bava
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Haadin Bava vs Christopher Heyman, Antalya 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research