Miki Jankovic vs Martin Blasko, Hammamet 2016, Round of 32

Final

Miki Jankovic

WinnerATP: 1609

Jankovic won in 2 sets · 1h 14m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 27–5

Martin Blasko

LostATP: 1606

Hotel Sentido PheniciaHammamet, TUN

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

83.2Very slow

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

18°CMild

16km/hGentle

79%Humid

7mSea level

Match stats

1h 14m

3Aces3

0Double faults5

42Service points won38

11Service games played10

10Service games won7

10Return games played11

1/250%Break points saved70%7/10

3/1030%Break points converted50%1/2

Head to head

2Jankovic

0Blasko

2 meetings

HammametRound of 32 · 16 Feb 2016ClayThis match
Miki Jankovic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Martin Blasko
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5
HammametRound of 16 · 11 Feb 2016Clay
Miki Jankovic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Martin Blasko
Sets won: 1Set 1: 0Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Miki Jankovic vs Martin Blasko, Hammamet 2016, Round of 32

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research