Amir Weintraub vs Matteo Viola, Ramat Gan 2016, Semifinal

Final

Amir Weintraub

LostATP: 1127

Viola won in 3 sets · 2h 5m

1–2

Set 16–4

Set 23–6

Set 31–6

Matteo Viola

WinnerATP: 1289

Kfar Maccabiah sports clubRamat Gan, ISR

Outdoor hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

95.4Slow

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

21°CMild

14km/hGentle

72%Humid

32mSea level

Match stats

2h 5m

2Aces2

1Double faults3

44Service points won58

13Service games played13

8Service games won11

13Return games played13

3/838%Break points saved85%11/13

2/1315%Break points converted63%5/8

Head to head

0Weintraub

1Viola

1 meeting

Ramat GanSemifinal · 13 Feb 2016HardThis match
Matteo Viola
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Amir Weintraub
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Amir Weintraub vs Matteo Viola, Ramat Gan 2016, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research