Alexander Bublik vs Lenny Hampel, Antalya 2016, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 12 Feb

Final

Alexander Bublik

WinnerRank #20

Bublik won in 2 sets · 1h 25m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 27–5

Lenny Hampel

LostRank #1335

Venue

Venue not available

Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Match stats

1h 25m

5Aces1

3Double faults2

51Service points won33

10Service games played11

9Service games won7

11Return games played10

6/786%Break points saved20%1/5

4/580%Break points converted14%1/7

Head to head

1Bublik

0Hampel

1 meeting

AntalyaQuarterfinal · 12 Feb 2016HardThis match
Alexander Bublik
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Lenny Hampel
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Alexander Bublik vs Lenny Hampel, Antalya 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research