Sherif Sabry vs Pol Toledo Bague, Hammamet 2016, Round of 16

Final

Sherif Sabry

LostATP: 1970

Bague won in 2 sets · 1h 1m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 20–6

Pol Toledo Bague

WinnerATP: 1812

Hotel Sentido PheniciaHammamet, TUN

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

83.8Very slow

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

22°CMild

18km/hGentle

72%Humid

7mSea level

Match stats

1h 1m

0Aces0

2Double faults3

16Service points won31

7Service games played7

2Service games won7

7Return games played7

2/729%Break points saved100%1/1

0/10%Break points converted71%5/7

Head to head

0Sabry

2Bague

2 meetings

Clay 0–1Hard 0–1

HammametRound of 16 · 11 Feb 2016ClayThis match
Pol Toledo Bague
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Sherif Sabry
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0
Sharm El SheikhRound of 32 · 30 Mar 2016Hard
Pol Toledo Bague
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Sherif Sabry
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Sherif Sabry vs Pol Toledo Bague, Hammamet 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research