Facundo Mena vs Omar Salman, Palm Coast 2016, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 5 Feb

Final

Facundo Mena

WinnerRank #198

Mena won in 2 sets · 1h 40m

2–0

Set 17–6¹

Set 26–4

Omar Salman

LostRank #1229

Venue

Southern Recreation Center

Palm Coast, USA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

10 m

Sea level

Match stats

1h 40m

3Aces1

2Double faults2

47Service points won45

11Service games played11

9Service games won8

11Return games played11

2/450%Break points saved57%4/7

3/743%Break points converted50%2/4

Head to head

1Mena

0Salman

1 meeting

Palm CoastQuarterfinal · 5 Feb 2016ClayThis match
Facundo Mena
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Omar Salman
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6¹Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Facundo Mena vs Omar Salman, Palm Coast 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research