Mikhail Vaks vs Connor Smith, Dallas Challenger 2016, Round of 32

Challenger · Round of 32 · Hard · Tue 2 Feb

Final

Mikhail Vaks

WinnerRank #9492.9432%Upset

Vaks won in 2 sets · 1h 10m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–2

Connor Smith

LostRank #14071.4168%

Venue

T Bar M Racquet Club

Dallas, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

193 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 10m

4Aces7

1Double faults1

38Service points won30

9Service games played9

8Service games won5

9Return games played9

3/475%Break points saved43%3/7

4/757%Break points converted25%1/4

Head to head

1Vaks

0Smith

1 meeting

Dallas ChallengerRound of 32 · 2 Feb 2016HardThis match
Mikhail Vaks
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Connor Smith
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Mikhail Vaks vs Connor Smith, Dallas Challenger 2016, Round of 32

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research