Niels Desein vs Mats Moraing, Nußloch 2016, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Carpet · Fri 29 Jan

Final

Niels Desein

WinnerRank #1456

Desein won in 2 sets · 1h 13m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–4

Mats Moraing

LostRank #1372

Venue

Zentrum Aktiver Prävention

Nussloch, GER· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

18 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

80%

Humid

Temperature

9°C

Cool

Altitude

110 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 13m

6Aces8

2Double faults5

41Service points won36

10Service games played9

10Service games won7

9Return games played10

0/0Break points saved67%4/6

2/633%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Desein

0Moraing

1 meeting

NußlochQuarterfinal · 29 Jan 2016CarpetThis match
Niels Desein
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Mats Moraing
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Niels Desein vs Mats Moraing, Nußloch 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research