Konstantin Kravchuk vs Taro Daniel, Kobe Challenger 2015, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 14 Nov

Final

Konstantin Kravchuk

LostRank #10872.1146%

Daniel won in 2 sets · 1h 26m

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 26–7⁴

Taro Daniel

WinnerRank #1771.7754%

Venue

Bourbon Beans Dome

Miki, JPN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

144 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 26m

13Aces3

1Double faults0

41Service points won52

11Service games played11

9Service games won10

11Return games played11

0/20%Break points saved75%3/4

1/425%Break points converted100%2/2

Head to head

0Kravchuk

1Daniel

1 meeting

Kobe ChallengerSemifinal · 14 Nov 2015HardThis match
Taro Daniel
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Konstantin Kravchuk
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6⁴

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Konstantin Kravchuk vs Taro Daniel, Kobe Challenger 2015, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research