Antal Van Der Duim vs David Poljak, Tartu 2015, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
6-2 6-2Venue and conditions
Tähtvere Tennis Club and tennis schoolTartu, EST
CarpetCourt speed4.0 vs last year105.4Fast
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Match stats
1h 10m5Aces5
2Double faults8
38Service points won35
8Service games played8
8Service games won4
8Return games played8
5/5100%Break points saved67%8/12
4/1233%Break points converted0%0/5
Head to head
1Duim
0Poljak
1 meeting- TartuQuarterfinal · 2015CarpetThis matchAntal Van Der DuimSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6David PoljakSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
Form and path
Antal Van Der Duim3–3
Villers-lès-NancyClay
HeraklionHard
- LSemifinalDanilo PetrovicSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Antal Van Der DuimSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 5
- WQuarterfinalAntal Van Der DuimSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Maxime AuthomSets won: 0Set 1: 68Set 2: 4
- WRound of 16Antal Van Der DuimSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Simon CarrSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3
- WRound of 32Antal Van Der DuimSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Marko TepavacSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5
David Poljak1–5
Porto CHClay
Hamburg CHHard
Cordenons CHClay
Iasi CHClay
- LRound of 32Gustavo HeideSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7David PoljakSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 64
- LQualifying R2Stefan Horia HaitaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6David PoljakSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
- WQualifying R1David PoljakSets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Alexandr BindaSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.