Michal Przysiezny vs Ivan Dodig, Brest Challenger 2015, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Hard · Wed 21 Oct

Final

Michal Przysiezny

LostRank #13452.6236%

Dodig won in 2 sets · 1h 8m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 23–6

Ivan Dodig

WinnerRank #4231.5064%

Venue

Brest Arena

Brest, FRA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

80 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 8m

5Aces9

5Double faults0

31Service points won35

9Service games played8

5Service games won8

8Return games played9

4/850%Break points saved100%2/2

0/20%Break points converted50%4/8

Head to head

0Przysiezny

1Dodig

1 meeting

Brest ChallengerRound of 16 · 21 Oct 2015HardThis match
Ivan Dodig
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Michal Przysiezny
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Michal Przysiezny vs Ivan Dodig, Brest Challenger 2015, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research