Jeremy Jahn vs Niels Lootsma, Oberhaching 2015, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
6-3 6-3Venue and conditions
TennisBase OberhachingOberhaching, GER
Outdoor hardCourt speed103.4Fast
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Match stats
1h 20m9Aces7
1Double faults7
40Service points won38
9Service games played9
8Service games won5
9Return games played9
2/367%Break points saved69%9/13
4/1331%Break points converted33%1/3
Head to head
2Jahn
0Lootsma
2 meetingsHard 1–0Clay 1–0
- OberhachingQuarterfinal · 2015HardThis matchJeremy JahnSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Niels LootsmaSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
- ScheveningenQualifying R2 · 15 Jul 2018ClayJeremy JahnSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 7Niels LootsmaSets won: 1Set 1: 66Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
Form and path
Jeremy Jahn2–4
Braga CHClay
Bad Waltersdorf CHClay
Tulln CHClay
Niels Lootsma3–3
AlkmaarClay
Ceska LipaClay
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.