Eric Quigley def. Phillip Simmonds 4-6 6-3 6-2

Back

Las Vegas Challenger

Challenger · Qualifying R2 · Hard · Sun 18 Oct

Final

Eric Quigley

WinnerUSA · Rank #1327

2–1

Set 14–6

Set 26–3

Set 36–2

Phillip Simmonds

LostUSA · Rank #1162

Quigley won in 3 sets · 1h 38m

Venue and conditions

At the match

Venue

Frank and Vicki Fertitta Tennis Complex

Las Vegas, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

How fast does this court play?

Unlock with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

622 m

Moderate

Match stats

1h 38m

Eric QuigleyQuigleyMatch statsPhillip SimmondsSimmonds

3Aces6

3Double faults6

56Service points won50

14Service games played13

13Service games won10

13Return games played14

0/1(0%)Break points saved4/7(57%)

3/7(43%)Break points converted1/1(100%)

First- and second-serve breakdown unavailable.

Head to head

1Quigley

0Simmonds

1 meeting

Las Vegas ChallengerQualifying R2 · 18 Oct 2015HardThis match
Eric Quigley
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Phillip Simmonds
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 2

Form and path

Eric Quigley

No recent matches recorded.

Phillip Simmonds2–4

Fairfield CHHard

LQualifying R1
Sebastian Fanselow
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Phillip Simmonds
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2

Champaign CHHard

LQualifying R1
Daniel Nguyen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Phillip Simmonds
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 5Set 3: 3

Knoxville CHHard

Sacramento CHHard

LRound of 32
Michael Mcclune
Sets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Phillip Simmonds
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 1

Match research

Pro

Explore player performance in the conditions, compare recent form and inspect the matches behind each number.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Explore Pro

Back

Las Vegas Challenger

Challenger · Qualifying R2 · Hard · Sun 18 Oct

Final

Eric Quigley

WinnerUSA · Rank #1327

2–1

Set 14–6

Set 26–3

Set 36–2

Phillip Simmonds

LostUSA · Rank #1162

Quigley won in 3 sets · 1h 38m

Venue and conditions

At the match

Venue

Frank and Vicki Fertitta Tennis Complex

Las Vegas, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

How fast does this court play?

Unlock with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

622 m

Moderate

Match stats

1h 38m

Eric QuigleyQuigleyMatch statsPhillip SimmondsSimmonds

3Aces6

3Double faults6

56Service points won50

14Service games played13

13Service games won10

13Return games played14

0/1(0%)Break points saved4/7(57%)

3/7(43%)Break points converted1/1(100%)

First- and second-serve breakdown unavailable.

Head to head

1Quigley

0Simmonds

1 meeting

Las Vegas ChallengerQualifying R2 · 18 Oct 2015HardThis match
Eric Quigley
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Phillip Simmonds
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 2

Form and path

Eric Quigley

No recent matches recorded.

Phillip Simmonds2–4

Fairfield CHHard

LQualifying R1
Sebastian Fanselow
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Phillip Simmonds
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2

Champaign CHHard

LQualifying R1
Daniel Nguyen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Phillip Simmonds
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 5Set 3: 3

Knoxville CHHard

Sacramento CHHard

LRound of 32
Michael Mcclune
Sets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Phillip Simmonds
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 1

Match research

Pro

Explore player performance in the conditions, compare recent form and inspect the matches behind each number.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Explore Pro

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research