Peter Kobelt vs Edan Leshem, Meitar 2015, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
7-5 4-6 7-6(9)Venue and conditions
Meitar Sports ClubMeitar, ISR
Outdoor hardCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
8Kobelt
2Leshem
10 meetingsHard 7–2Clay 1–0
- MeitarQuarterfinal · 2015HardThis matchPeter KobeltSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 7Edan LeshemSets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 69
- Tel AvivSemifinal · 8 Jun 2018HardPeter KobeltSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Edan LeshemSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
- SajurSemifinal · 12 May 2018HardPeter KobeltSets won: 1Set 1: 6Edan LeshemSets won: 0Set 1: 3
Edan Leshem · Retired
- AkkoQuarterfinal · 11 May 2017HardEdan LeshemSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Peter KobeltSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
- Ramat HaSharonRound of 16 · 23 Mar 2016HardPeter KobeltSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Edan LeshemSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2
- HerzliyaQuarterfinal · 10 Mar 2016HardPeter KobeltSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Edan LeshemSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
Form and path
Peter Kobelt3–3
HeraklionHard
- LSemifinalDavid PichlerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Peter KobeltSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
- WQuarterfinalPeter KobeltSets won: 2Set 1: 610Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Uisung ParkSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 2
- WRound of 16Peter KobeltSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Sean HodkinSets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
- WRound of 32Peter KobeltSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Alexandar LazarovSets won: 0Set 1: 62Set 2: 0
Alexandar Lazarov · Retired
Edan Leshem1–5
HeraklionHard
Indian Wells 2 CHHard
Indian Wells CHHard
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.