Nico Matic vs Jelle Sels, Jūrmala 2015, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
4-6 6-4 6-4
Venue and conditions
Lielupe Tennis CentreJūrmala, LAT
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
0Matic
1Sels
1 meeting- JūrmalaQuarterfinal · 2015ClayThis matchJelle SelsSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Nico MaticSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 4
Form and path
Nico Matic4–2
HeraklionHard
- LRound of 32Baptiste CrepatteSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Nico MaticSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R3Nico MaticSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Pablo Schelcher MuroSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
- WQualifying R2Nico MaticSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Kenta KuritaSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2
- WQualifying R1Nico MaticSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Stefan LuckanovSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
Jelle Sels3–3
SheffieldHard
RedbridgeHard
OffenbachHard
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.