Marcos Baghdatis vs Sam Groth, Atlanta 2015, Round of 16

ATP 250 · Round of 16 · Hard · Wed 29 Jul

Final

Marcos Baghdatis

WinnerRank #1791.5364%

Baghdatis won in 3 sets · 2h 3m

2–1

Set 17–5

Set 23–6

Set 36–3

Sam Groth

LostRank #11552.7036%

Venue

Atlantic Station

Atlanta, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Fast

5.4vs last year

Wind

10 km/h

Light

Humidity

66%

Moderate

Temperature

35°C

Hot

Altitude

271 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

2h 3m

11Aces16

2Double faults8

58Service points won58

15Service games played15

13Service games won12

15Return games played15

5/771%Break points saved63%5/8

3/838%Break points converted29%2/7

Head to head

1Baghdatis

0Groth

1 meeting

AtlantaRound of 16 · 29 Jul 2015HardThis match
Marcos Baghdatis
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Sam Groth
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Marcos Baghdatis vs Sam Groth, Atlanta 2015, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research