Sho Katayama vs Thomas Fancutt, Tumon 2015, Round of 16
Final score
Final
3-6 6-2 6-4
Venue and conditions
Hilton Guam Resort & Spa Tennis CourtsTumon, GUM
Outdoor hardCourt speed98.3Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Katayama
0Fancutt
1 meeting- TumonRound of 16 · 2015HardThis matchSho KatayamaSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Thomas FancuttSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 4
Form and path
Sho Katayama1–5
Matsuyama CHHard
Yanagawa CityHard
Matsuyama CHHard
Thomas Fancutt2–4
Brisbane 3 CHHard
- LRound of 32Matthew DellavedovaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 67Set 3: 7Thomas FancuttSets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 7Set 3: 65
- WQualifying R2Thomas FancuttSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Tai Leonard SachSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5
- WQualifying R1Thomas FancuttSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 6Evan ZhuSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 4
Jinan CHHard
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.