Matthew Barton vs Chieh Fu Wang, Taipei Challenger 2015, Round of 32

Challenger · Round of 32 · Carpet · Tue 28 Apr

Final

Matthew Barton

WinnerRank #1017

Barton won in 2 sets · 58m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–2

Chieh Fu Wang

LostRank #1793

Venue

NTU Sports Center

Taipei, TPE· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

14 m

Sea level

Match stats

58m

8Aces5

1Double faults3

38Service points won26

9Service games played8

9Service games won5

8Return games played9

0/0Break points saved63%5/8

3/838%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Barton

0Wang

1 meeting

Taipei ChallengerRound of 32 · 28 Apr 2015CarpetThis match
Matthew Barton
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Chieh Fu Wang
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Matthew Barton vs Chieh Fu Wang, Taipei Challenger 2015, Round of 32

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research