Maxime Authom vs Taro Daniel, Cherbourg Challenger 2015, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Hard · Wed 25 Feb

Final

Maxime Authom

WinnerRank #6441.7953%

Authom won in 2 sets · 1h 7m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–3

Taro Daniel

LostRank #1792.0547%

Venue

Complexe Jean Jaures

Cherbourg, FRA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

23 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Match stats

1h 7m

3Aces2

1Double faults2

32Service points won26

8Service games played9

7Service games won4

9Return games played8

2/367%Break points saved17%1/6

5/683%Break points converted33%1/3

Head to head

1Authom

0Daniel

1 meeting

Cherbourg ChallengerRound of 16 · 25 Feb 2015HardThis match
Maxime Authom
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Taro Daniel
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Maxime Authom vs Taro Daniel, Cherbourg Challenger 2015, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research