Gianluca Naso vs Jordan Ubiergo, Peguera 2015, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
7-5 7-6(0)Venue and conditions
Tennis Academy MallorcaPeguera, ESP
ClayCourt speed6.6 vs last year95.0Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Naso
0Ubiergo
1 meeting- PegueraQuarterfinal · 2015ClayThis matchGianluca NasoSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7Jordan UbiergoSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 60
Form and path
Gianluca Naso3–3
LeccoClay
- LRound of 16Liam CaruanaSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Gianluca NasoSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 67Set 3: 3
- WRound of 32Gianluca NasoSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Roberto MarcoraSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R2Gianluca NasoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Ottaviano MartiniSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1
- WQualifying R1Gianluca NasoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Antonio MastreliaSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5
Jordan Ubiergo4–2
MonastirHard
- LRound of 16Yassine SmiejSets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Jordan UbiergoSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 5
- WRound of 32Jordan UbiergoSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Kris Van WykSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 3
- WQualifying R3Jordan UbiergoSets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 7Set 3: 12Maxim ShinSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 65Set 3: 10
- WQualifying R2Jordan UbiergoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Simon MyslivecSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R1Jordan UbiergoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Elbert BarrSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.