Marko Danis vs Yannick Maden, Bratislava Challenger 2014, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sat 1 Nov

Final

Marko Danis

LostRank #1694

Maden won in 2 sets · 1h 16m

0–2

Set 15–7

Set 22–6

Yannick Maden

WinnerRank #1474

Venue

National Tennis Centre

Bratislava, SVK· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

143 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 16m

2Aces8

6Double faults4

30Service points won43

10Service games played10

5Service games won8

10Return games played10

0/50%Break points saved60%3/5

2/540%Break points converted100%5/5

Head to head

0Danis

1Maden

1 meeting

Bratislava ChallengerQualifying R1 · 1 Nov 2014HardThis match
Yannick Maden
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Marko Danis
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Marko Danis vs Yannick Maden, Bratislava Challenger 2014, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research