Peter Goldsteiner vs Matija Pecotic, Antalya 2014, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard

Final

Peter Goldsteiner

LostRank #2080

Pecotic won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 24–6

Matija Pecotic

WinnerRank #1883

Venue

Venue not available

Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Head to head

0Goldsteiner

1Pecotic

1 meeting

AntalyaRound of 16 · 2014HardThis match
Matija Pecotic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Peter Goldsteiner
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4

Form and path

Peter Goldsteiner4–2

ViennaClay

RovinjClay

Matija Pecotic4–2

BolClay

UmagClay

LQualifying R1
Marco Trungelliti
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Matija Pecotic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Peter Goldsteiner vs Matija Pecotic, Antalya 2014, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research