Anton Pavlov vs Tero Jokinen, Vierumäki 2014, Qualifying R1
Final score
Final
6-3 6-1Venue and conditions
Vierumäki Tennis CourtsVierumäki, FIN
ClayCourt speed93.7Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Pavlov
0Jokinen
1 meeting- VierumäkiQualifying R1 · 2014ClayThis matchAnton PavlovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Tero JokinenSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
Form and path
Anton Pavlov0–6
TallinnHard
- LQualifying R1Dmitry MnushkinSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Anton PavlovSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
TallinnHard
- LQualifying R1Timur KiyamovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Anton PavlovSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0
TartuCarpet
PärnuClay
Sharm El SheikhHard
- LQualifying R3Bernd KosslerSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Anton PavlovSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 4
Tero Jokinen0–5
Tampere CHClay
VierumäkiClay
- LQualifying R1Anssi RaasioSets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Tero JokinenSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 5
Tampere CHClay
Tampere CHClay
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.