Tatsuma Ito vs Emilio Gomez, Manta Challenger 2014, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Hard · Thu 3 Jul

Final

Tatsuma Ito

LostRank #1822

Gomez won in 2 sets · 58m

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 24–6

Emilio Gomez

WinnerRank #1508

Venue

Umiña Tenis Club

Manta, ECU· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

20 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

77%

Humid

Temperature

29°C

Warm

Altitude

20 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

58m

3Aces9

3Double faults1

24Service points won37

8Service games played9

5Service games won9

9Return games played8

1/425%Break points saved100%2/2

0/20%Break points converted75%3/4

Head to head

0Ito

1Gomez

1 meeting

Manta ChallengerQuarterfinal · 3 Jul 2014HardThis match
Emilio Gomez
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tatsuma Ito
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tatsuma Ito vs Emilio Gomez, Manta Challenger 2014, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research