Peter Torebko vs Blazej Koniusz, Furth 2014, Qualifying R3
Final score
Final
6-7(5) 6-4 7-5Venue and conditions
TV 1860 Furth (Franken Challenge / Schickedanz Open)Furth, GER
ClayCourt speed1.2 vs last year93.5Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
2h 21m7Aces3
5Double faults3
59Service points won60
17Service games played17
12Service games won10
17Return games played17
1/617%Break points saved50%7/14
7/1450%Break points converted83%5/6
Head to head
3Torebko
0Koniusz
3 meetingsClay 2–0Carpet 1–0
- FurthQualifying R3 · 2 Jun 2014ClayThis matchPeter TorebkoSets won: 2Set 1: 65Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Blazej KoniuszSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 5
- SchwieberdingenRound of 32 · 2014CarpetPeter TorebkoSets won: 2Set 1: 63Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Blazej KoniuszSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 62
- BudapestQuarterfinal · 2013ClayPeter TorebkoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Blazej KoniuszSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 66
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.