Juraj Masar vs Adrian Partl, Prijedor 2014, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay

Final

Juraj Masar

WinnerRank #1770

Masar won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 16–7⁴

Set 26–4

Set 37–6⁴

Adrian Partl

LostRank #1811

Venue

Teniski klub Dr Mladen Stojanović

Prijedor, BIH· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

137 m

Low

Head to head

1Masar

0Partl

1 meeting

PrijedorQuarterfinal · 2014ClayThis match
Juraj Masar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Adrian Partl
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 6⁴

Form and path

Juraj Masar4–2

BratislavaHard

BudapestClay

LRound of 32
Levente Godry
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Juraj Masar
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 3

Adrian Partl2–4

Trnava CHClay

LQualifying R2
Karol Drzewiecki
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Adrian Partl
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6²Set 2: 4

Slovenská ĽupčaClay

LRound of 32
Tomas Hrabec
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3
Adrian Partl
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Adrian Partl · Retired

KramsachClay

LRound of 16
Miljan Zekic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Adrian Partl
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1
WRound of 32
Adrian Partl
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Daniel Baumann
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

BrnoClay

LRound of 16
Zdenek Kolar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Adrian Partl
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
WRound of 32
Adrian Partl
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Henri Laaksonen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Juraj Masar vs Adrian Partl, Prijedor 2014, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research