Daniel Munoz de la Nava vs Frederico Gil, Estoril 2014, Qualifying R1
Final score
Final
Gil won in 3 sets · 2h 51m
1–2
Set 14–6
Set 27–67
Set 34–6
Venue and conditions
Complexo de Ténis do JamorCruz Quebrada, POR
ClayCourt speed3.4 vs last year90.9Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
2h 51m6Aces4
8Double faults5
70Service points won71
16Service games played16
12Service games won14
16Return games played16
7/1164%Break points saved67%4/6
2/633%Break points converted36%4/11
Head to head
2Nava
3Gil
5 meetings- EstorilQualifying R1 · 26 Apr 2014ClayThis matchFrederico GilSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 67Set 3: 6Daniel Munoz de la NavaSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 4
- SevilleRound of 16 · 10 Sept 2014ClayDaniel Munoz de la NavaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Frederico GilSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
- PoznanQuarterfinal · 23 Jul 2010ClayDaniel Munoz de la NavaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 64Set 3: 6Frederico GilSets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 7Set 3: 4
- ProstejovRound of 32 · 1 Jun 2010ClayFrederico GilSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Daniel Munoz de la NavaSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
- BarcelonaQualifying R2 · 19 Apr 2009ClayFrederico GilSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 6Daniel Munoz de la NavaSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.