Rajeev Ram vs Chase Buchanan, Rimouski Challenger 2014, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 20 Mar

Final

Rajeev Ram

WinnerRank #10761.3372%

Ram won in 2 sets · 1h 0m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–3

Chase Buchanan

LostRank #13593.3628%

Venue

Tennis de Rimouski

Rimouski, CAN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

47 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Match stats

1h 0m

3Aces3

2Double faults4

38Service points won29

9Service games played9

9Service games won6

9Return games played9

0/0Break points saved25%1/4

3/475%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Ram

0Buchanan

1 meeting

Rimouski ChallengerRound of 16 · 20 Mar 2014HardThis match
Rajeev Ram
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Chase Buchanan
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Rajeev Ram vs Chase Buchanan, Rimouski Challenger 2014, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research