Lukas Rosol vs Marin Cilic, Rotterdam 2014, Round of 32
Final score
Final
6-2 6-2
Venue and conditions
Rotterdam AhoyRotterdam, NED
Indoor hardCourt speed0.3 vs last year104.3Fast
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksAltitude4 mSea level
Match stats
1h 1m3Aces8
1Double faults1
26Service points won35
8Service games played8
4Service games won8
8Return games played8
2/633%Break points saved100%1/1
0/10%Break points converted67%4/6
Head to head
0Rosol
4Cilic
4 meetingsHard 0–2Clay 0–1Grass 0–1
- RotterdamRound of 32 · 11 Feb 2014HardThis matchMarin CilicSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Lukas RosolSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
- UmagQuarterfinal · 25 Jul 2014ClayMarin CilicSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Lukas RosolSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2
- Queen's ClubRound of 16 · 14 Jun 2012GrassMarin CilicSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Lukas RosolSets won: 0Set 1: 63Set 2: 2
- Dallas 2Round of 16 · 2012HardMarin CilicSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Lukas RosolSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 62
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.