Ivo Minar vs James Junior Storme, Mons Challenger 2013, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sat 28 Sept

Final

Ivo Minar

LostRank #1784

Storme won in 2 sets · 1h 1m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 23–6

James Junior Storme

WinnerUnranked

Venue

Lotto Mons Expo

Mons, BEL· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

29 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Match stats

1h 1m

2Aces3

0Double faults2

27Service points won37

9Service games played8

5Service games won8

8Return games played9

2/633%Break points saved100%3/3

0/30%Break points converted67%4/6

Head to head

0Minar

1Storme

1 meeting

Mons ChallengerQualifying R1 · 28 Sept 2013HardThis match
James Junior Storme
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Ivo Minar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Ivo Minar vs James Junior Storme, Mons Challenger 2013, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research