Matej Sabanov vs Jefta Kecic, Subotica 2013, Qualifying R3
Final score
Final
6-2 6-2Venue and conditions
TK Spartak, Dudova šumaSubotica, SRB
ClayCourt speed86.5Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Sabanov
0Kecic
1 meeting- SuboticaQualifying R3 · 2013ClayThis matchMatej SabanovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jefta KecicSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
Form and path
Matej Sabanov4–2
BolClay
- LRound of 32Geoffrey BlancaneauxSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 6Matej SabanovSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
- WQualifying R3Matej SabanovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Gabrielius GuzauskasSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2
- WQualifying R2Matej SabanovSets won: 0Set 1: 4Deney WassermannSets won: 0Set 1: 2
- WQualifying R1Matej SabanovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Artem PodorozhnyiSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
Jefta Kecic2–2
SuboticaThis week
- WQualifying R2Jefta KecicSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Davor IvkovicSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1
- WQualifying R1Jefta KecicSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 5Set 3: 6Gabor MatheSets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 7Set 3: 3
SuboticaClay
- LQualifying R2Gibril DiarraSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Jefta KecicSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 2
- WQualifying R1Jefta KecicSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Andras KetyiSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 62
OsijekClay
- LQualifying R2Jakub OravecSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Jefta KecicSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R1Jefta KecicSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Filip KresicSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.