Joel Kielbowicz vs Andrew J. Schafer, Pittsburgh 2013, Qualifying R3
Final score
Final
7-5 6-1Venue and conditions
Mt. Lebanon Tennis CenterMt. Lebanon, USA
ClayCourt speed92.6Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Kielbowicz
0Schafer
1 meeting- PittsburghQualifying R3 · 2013ClayThis matchJoel KielbowiczSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Andrew J. SchaferSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 1
Form and path
Joel Kielbowicz1–2
PittsburghThis week
- LRound of 16Shane VinsantSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Joel KielbowiczSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 4
- WRound of 32Joel KielbowiczSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Jean Yves AuboneSets won: 1Set 1: 63Set 2: 6Set 3: 2
- WQualifying R2Joel KielbowiczSets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 7Set 3: 7Casey WattSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 65Set 3: 5
ClaremontHard
Andrew J. Schafer3–1
PittsburghThis week
- WQualifying R2Andrew J. SchaferSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Aws LaaribiSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 0
- WQualifying R1Andrew J. SchaferSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 0Set 3: 7Roman TrkuljaSets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 62
PittsburghClay
- LRound of 32Hunter HarringtonSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Andrew J. SchaferSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
- WQualifying R3Andrew J. SchaferSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Robert ShulmanSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
- WQualifying R2Andrew J. SchaferSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Kevin Mario GandiniSets won: 0Set 1: 62Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R1Andrew J. SchaferSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Nail KhabiyevSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
Nail Khabiyev · Retired
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.