Damir Dzumhur vs Juraj Masar, Kiseljak 2013, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Clay

Final

Damir Dzumhur

WinnerRank #83

Dzumhur won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 27–5

Juraj Masar

LostRank #1770

Venue

Tennis Club Elliptic

Gromiljak, BIH· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

490 m

Moderate

Head to head

1Dzumhur

0Masar

1 meeting

KiseljakSemifinal · 2013ClayThis match
Damir Dzumhur
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Juraj Masar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5

Form and path

Damir Dzumhur5–1

BrusselsHard

Olbia CHHard

Juraj Masar4–2

BratislavaHard

BudapestClay

LRound of 32
Levente Godry
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Juraj Masar
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Damir Dzumhur vs Juraj Masar, Kiseljak 2013, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research