Jonathan Eysseric vs Di Wu, Cherbourg Challenger 2013, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 28 Feb

Final

Jonathan Eysseric

LostRank #13192.1245%

Wu won in 2 sets · 1h 38m

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 26–7³

Di Wu

WinnerRank #11431.7055%

Venue

Complexe Jean Jaures

Cherbourg, FRA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

25 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Match stats

1h 38m

7Aces1

3Double faults1

50Service points won43

11Service games played11

7Service games won8

11Return games played11

8/1267%Break points saved50%3/6

3/650%Break points converted33%4/12

Head to head

0Eysseric

1Wu

1 meeting

Cherbourg ChallengerRound of 16 · 28 Feb 2013HardThis match
Di Wu
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Jonathan Eysseric
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6³

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jonathan Eysseric vs Di Wu, Cherbourg Challenger 2013, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research