Lukas Rosol vs Maxime Authom, Mons Challenger 2012, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Hard · Wed 3 Oct

Final

Lukas Rosol

LostRank #1777

Authom won in 3 sets · 2h 21m

1–2

Set 15–7

Set 26–3

Set 36–7⁵

Maxime Authom

WinnerRank #644

Venue

Lotto Mons Expo

Mons, BEL· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

29 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Match stats

2h 21m

22Aces16

3Double faults0

79Service points won73

17Service games played16

16Service games won15

16Return games played17

10/1191%Break points saved67%2/3

1/333%Break points converted9%1/11

Head to head

0Rosol

1Authom

1 meeting

Mons ChallengerRound of 16 · 3 Oct 2012HardThis match
Maxime Authom
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 7⁷
Lukas Rosol
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁵

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Lukas Rosol vs Maxime Authom, Mons Challenger 2012, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research