Marek Semjan vs Filip Horansky, Piešťany 2012, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
6-0 6-3Venue and conditions
HSC Piešťany, Hlboká 92Piešťany, SVK
ClayCourt speed94.6Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Semjan
3Horansky
4 meetings- PiešťanyQuarterfinal · 2012ClayThis matchMarek SemjanSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Filip HoranskySets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 3
- BalatonalmadiRound of 16 · 25 May 2017ClayFilip HoranskySets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Marek SemjanSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
- PiešťanySemifinal · 2015ClayFilip HoranskySets won: 0Set 1: 5Marek SemjanSets won: 0Set 1: 2
Marek Semjan · Retired
- TrnavaQuarterfinal · 2013ClayFilip HoranskySets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Marek SemjanSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Form and path
Marek Semjan2–4
BratislavaClay
BratislavaClay
TrnavaHard
Filip Horansky2–4
Bratislava 2 CHHard
Ortisei CHHard
AntwerpHard
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.