Eric Prodon vs Patrik Rosenholm, Tampere 2012, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
6-2 6-1Venue and conditions
Tampereen TenniskeskusTampere, FIN
ClayCourt speed6.5 vs last year91.6Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
48m1Aces0
0Double faults2
32Service points won14
8Service games played7
7Service games won2
7Return games played8
3/475%Break points saved50%5/10
5/1050%Break points converted25%1/4
Head to head
1Prodon
0Rosenholm
1 meeting- TampereQuarterfinal · 27 Jul 2012ClayThis matchEric ProdonSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Patrik RosenholmSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.