Wayne Odesnik vs Jurgen Zopp, Kitzbuhel 2012, Round of 16

ATP 250 · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 26 Jul

Final

Wayne Odesnik

WinnerRank #2672.6637%Upset

Odesnik won in 3 sets · 2h 27m

2–1

Set 15–7

Set 27–5

Set 36–3

Jurgen Zopp

LostRank #14061.5463%

Venue

Kitzbüheler Tennisclub

Kitzbühel, AUT· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Slow

0.8vs last year

Wind

7 km/h

Light

Humidity

83%

Humid

Temperature

24°C

Warm

Altitude

756 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Match stats

2h 27m

3Aces8

6Double faults2

67Service points won59

17Service games played16

14Service games won12

16Return games played17

5/863%Break points saved60%6/10

4/1040%Break points converted38%3/8

Head to head

1Odesnik

0Zopp

1 meeting

KitzbuhelRound of 16 · 26 Jul 2012ClayThis match
Wayne Odesnik
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Jurgen Zopp
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 5Set 3: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Wayne Odesnik vs Jurgen Zopp, Kitzbuhel 2012, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research