Nick Chappell vs Costin Paval, Godfrey 2012, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard

Final

Nick Chappell

WinnerRank #1706

Chappell won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–4

Costin Paval

LostRank #1555

Venue

Andy Simpson Tennis Complex, Lewis and Clark Community College

Godfrey, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

180 m

Low

Head to head

1Chappell

0Paval

1 meeting

GodfreyRound of 16 · 2012HardThis match
Nick Chappell
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Costin Paval
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Form and path

Nick Chappell3–3

Cary CHHard

LuzhouHard

LuanHard

LRound of 32
Evan Zhu
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Nick Chappell
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6²

Costin Paval4–2

AntalyaClay

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Nick Chappell vs Costin Paval, Godfrey 2012, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research