Filip Havaj vs Darius Neica, Arad Challenger 2012, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Clay · Sun 1 Jul

Final

Filip Havaj

WinnerRank #1746

Havaj won in 2 sets · 1h 43m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–3

Darius Neica

LostUnranked

Venue

Activ Club Arad

Arad, ROU· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

9 km/h

Light

Humidity

56%

Moderate

Temperature

34°C

Hot

Altitude

105 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 43m

0Aces1

0Double faults4

38Service points won32

9Service games played9

8Service games won5

9Return games played9

3/475%Break points saved56%5/9

4/944%Break points converted25%1/4

Head to head

1Havaj

0Neica

1 meeting

Arad ChallengerQualifying R1 · 1 Jul 2012ClayThis match
Filip Havaj
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Darius Neica
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Filip Havaj vs Darius Neica, Arad Challenger 2012, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research