Jan Hajek vs Marius Copil, Marburg Challenger 2012, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Clay · Sat 30 Jun

Final

Jan Hajek

WinnerRank #11991.3770%

Hajek won in 3 sets · 1h 46m

2–1

Set 16–3

Set 23–6

Set 36–3

Marius Copil

LostRank #10213.1530%

Venue

TV 1965 Marburg

Marburg, GER· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

9 km/h

Light

Humidity

75%

Humid

Temperature

25°C

Warm

Altitude

181 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 46m

3Aces15

1Double faults6

59Service points won48

14Service games played13

12Service games won10

13Return games played14

9/1182%Break points saved67%6/9

3/933%Break points converted18%2/11

Head to head

3Hajek

2Copil

5 meetings

Clay 3–1Hard 0–1

Marburg ChallengerSemifinal · 30 Jun 2012ClayThis match
Jan Hajek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Marius Copil
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
Trnava ChallengerRound of 32 · 17 Sept 2014Clay
Jan Hajek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Marius Copil
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
Heilbronn ChallengerRound of 16 · 24 Jan 2013Hard
Marius Copil
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Jan Hajek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5
Kosice ChallengerRound of 32 · 13 Jun 2012Clay
Jan Hajek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Marius Copil
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6¹Set 2: 2
Oberstaufen ChallengerQualifying R2 · 13 Jul 2008Clay
Marius Copil
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 7Set 3: 7⁷
Jan Hajek
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6⁵

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jan Hajek vs Marius Copil, Marburg Challenger 2012, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research