Artem Sitak vs Denys Molchanov, Marburg 2012, Qualifying R2
Final score
Final
0-6 7-5 6-4Venue and conditions
TV 1965 MarburgMarburg, GER
ClayCourt speed1.2 vs last year96.6Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
2h 2m4Aces2
5Double faults6
44Service points won53
14Service games played14
7Service games won6
14Return games played14
3/1030%Break points saved43%6/14
8/1457%Break points converted70%7/10
Head to head
1Sitak
2Molchanov
3 meetingsClay 0–1Hard 1–1
- MarburgQualifying R2 · 24 Jun 2012ClayThis matchDenys MolchanovSets won: 2Set 1: 0Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Artem SitakSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 4
- NamanganQuarterfinal · 2010HardDenys MolchanovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Artem SitakSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
- AlbufeiraSemifinal · 2008HardArtem SitakSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Denys MolchanovSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.