Thomas Schoorel vs Martin Klizan, Prague 2012, Round of 32
Final score
Final
7-6(1) 6-3
Venue and conditions
I. ČLTK PrahaPrague, CZE
ClayCourt speed3.1 vs last year96.0Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 43m4Aces12
2Double faults0
48Service points won49
11Service games played10
9Service games won10
10Return games played11
5/771%Break points saved100%4/4
0/40%Break points converted29%2/7
Head to head
3Schoorel
1Klizan
4 meetingsClay 2–1Hard 1–0
- PragueRound of 32 · 8 May 2012ClayThis matchMartin KlizanSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Thomas SchoorelSets won: 0Set 1: 61Set 2: 3
- DortmundQuarterfinal · 29 Jul 2011ClayThomas SchoorelSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Martin KlizanSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
- RomeFinal · 17 Apr 2011ClayThomas SchoorelSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 1Set 3: 6Martin KlizanSets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
- ZagrebRound of 32 · 2008HardThomas SchoorelSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Martin KlizanSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.