Marc Sieber vs Norbert Gombos, Prague 2012, Qualifying R2
Final score
Final
6-1 4-6 7-5
Venue and conditions
I. ČLTK PrahaPrague, CZE
ClayCourt speed3.1 vs last year96.0Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 50m4Aces3
7Double faults3
46Service points won45
14Service games played15
9Service games won7
15Return games played14
6/1155%Break points saved38%5/13
8/1362%Break points converted45%5/11
Head to head
1Sieber
1Gombos
2 meetingsClay 1–0Hard 0–1
- PragueQualifying R2 · 6 May 2012ClayThis matchMarc SieberSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 7Norbert GombosSets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
- Bangkok 4Round of 16 · 1 Sept 2016HardNorbert GombosSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Marc SieberSets won: 0Set 1: 65Set 2: 1
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.