Tobias Kamke vs Marius Copil, Bucharest 2012, Round of 32
Final score
Final
6-3 6-2Venue and conditions
Arenele BNRBucharest, ROU
ClayCourt speed0.2 vs last year94.0Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 22m0Aces6
4Double faults1
36Service points won38
8Service games played9
5Service games won9
9Return games played8
9/1275%Break points saved100%1/1
0/10%Break points converted25%3/12
Head to head
1Kamke
3Copil
4 meetingsClay 0–1Hard 1–1Grass 0–1
- BucharestRound of 32 · 24 Apr 2012ClayThis matchMarius CopilSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Tobias KamkeSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
- RotterdamQualifying R1 · 11 Feb 2017HardMarius CopilSets won: 2Set 1: 61Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Tobias KamkeSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 63Set 3: 1
- IstanbulQuarterfinal · 16 Sept 2016HardTobias KamkeSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Marius CopilSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
- SurbitonQuarterfinal · 10 Jun 2016GrassMarius CopilSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 6Tobias KamkeSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.