Timo Nieminen vs Andrea Arnaboldi, Rome 2012, Qualifying R2
Final score
Final
6-3 6-4Venue and conditions
Tennis Club GardenRome, ITA
ClayCourt speed1.9 vs last year92.9Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 31m0Aces3
7Double faults5
22Service points won35
9Service games played10
3Service games won6
10Return games played9
5/1145%Break points saved33%2/6
4/667%Break points converted55%6/11
Head to head
1Nieminen
2Arnaboldi
3 meetingsClay 0–1Hard 1–1
- RomeQualifying R2 · 16 Apr 2012ClayThis matchAndrea ArnaboldiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Timo NieminenSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
- TorreónRound of 16 · 2004HardTimo NieminenSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Andrea ArnaboldiSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
- MonterreyRound of 16 · 2004HardAndrea ArnaboldiSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 7Timo NieminenSets won: 1Set 1: 65Set 2: 6Set 3: 68
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.